| 7,537 | 160 | 418 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
信息技术革命和国际垂直分工深刻地改变了全球制造业的生产格局和竞争基础，传统的企业间竞争正逐渐演化为供应链间的竞争。对2011—2018年A股制造业上市公司的实证分析发现：供应商集中度负向影响企业创新，但这一效应在市场地位较高的企业中得到弱化；客户集中度与企业创新则呈显著正相关，且在市场地位较高的企业中得到强化。研究还发现，融资约束缓解是供应链集中度影响企业创新活动的作用渠道。研究对于供应链与创新活动之间的关系做出了文献贡献，并对创新驱动发展战略下企业根据自身市场地位权变性地从事创新活动提供了实践指导。
Abstract：The information technology revolution and the international vertical division of labor have changed the manufacturing pattern and basis of competition in the global manufacturing industry.The traditional competition among firms is gradually evolving into the competition among supply chains.Based on the empirical analysis of A-share manufacturing listed companies in China from2011 to 2018,we find that firm innovation is related with supplier concentration negatively,but the effect will be weakened in firms with higher market position.However,the firm innovation is related with customer concentration positively,and it will be strengthened among firms with higher market position.The release of financial constraint is the mechanism of the relationship between supply chain and innovation activities.The research provides literature contribution and practical guidance for firms to engage in innovation activities according to their own market position under the strategy of innovation-driven development.
[1]PORTER M.Capital disadvantage:America's failing capital investment system[J].Harvard Business Review,1992,70(5):65-82.
[2]SCHUMPETER J.Development[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2005,43(1):108-120.
[3]MAHMOOD I,RUFIN C.Government's dilemma:the role of government in imitation and innovation[J].Academy of Management Review,2005,30(2):338-360.
[4]MICHAEL S,PEARCE J.The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship[J].Regional Development,2009,21(3):285-302.
[5]EDERER F,MANSO G.Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation?[J].Operations Research,2014,54(3):187-189.
[6]刘波，李志生，王泓力，等.现金流不确定性与企业创新[J].经济研究，2017(3):166-180.
[7]张璇，刘贝贝，汪婷，等.信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J].经济研究，2017(5):161-174.
[8]DANNY L,WILLIAM W,ZACH Z.Concentrated supply chain membership and financial performance:chain-and firm-level perspectives[J].Journal of Operations Management,2010,28(1):1-16.
[9]DOWLATSHAHI S.Bargaining power in buyer-supplier relationships[J].Production and Inventory Management Journal,1999,40(1):27-35.
[10]潘越，潘健平，戴亦一.公司诉讼风险、司法地方保护主义与企业创新[J].经济研究，2015(3):131-145.
[11]WILLIAMSON O.The theory of the firm as governance structure:from choice to contract[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2002,16(3):171-195.
[12]CHEN C,LI Z,SU X,et al.Relationship-specific investment and accounting conservatism:effect of customers and suppliers[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2008.DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1267068.
[13]吉利，陶存杰.供应链合作伙伴可以提高企业创新业绩吗?——基于供应商、客户集中度的分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报，2019(1):38-46,65.
[14]COOL K,DIERICKX I,JEMISON D.Business strategy,market structure and risk-return relationships:a structural approach[J].Strategic Management Journal,2010,10(6):507-522.
[15]MANSO G.Motivating innovation[J].Journal of Finance,2011,66(5):1823-1860.
[16]LUKAS B,FERRELL O.The effect of market orientation on product innovation[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2000,28(2):239-247.
[17]CHU Y,XUAN T,WANG W.Corporate innovation along the supply chain[J].Management Science,2019,65(6):2445-2466.
[18]FELDMAN M.The new economics of innovation,spillovers and agglomeration:a review of empirical studies[J].Economics of Innovation & New Technology,1999,8(1):5-25.
[19]邢立全，王韦程，陈汉文.产品市场竞争、竞争地位与盈余管理[J].南京审计学院学报，2016(3):30-43.
[20]DATTA S,MAI I,SINGH V.Product market power,industry structure,and corporate earnings management[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2013,37(8):3273-3285.
[21]NICKELL S.Competition and corporate performance[J].Journal of Political Economy,1996,104(4):724-746.
[22]郭娜.政府?市场?谁更有效——中小企业融资难解决机制有效性研究[J].金融研究，2013(3):194-206.
[23]TSAI W.Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
[24]EXPOSITO-LANGA M,MOLINA-MORALES F,CAPO-VICEDO J.New product development and absorptive capacity in industrial districts:a multidimensional approach[J].Regional Studies,2011,45(3):319-331.
[25]党印，鲁桐.公司治理与技术创新:两个基本模型[J].财经科学，2014(7):72-81.
[26]WANG Y,ZHAO J.Hedge funds and corporate innovation[J].Financial Management,2015,44(2):353-385.
[27]陈峻，王雄元，彭旋.环境不确定性、客户集中度与权益资本成本[J].会计研究，2015(11):76-82.
[28]文旭倩，叶勇.客户集中对企业创新投入的影响——基于融资结构的中介效应[J].数理统计与管理，2020(4):675-690.
[29]王迪，刘祖基，赵泽朋.供应链关系与银行借款——基于供应商/客户集中度的分析[J].会计研究，2016(10):42-49.
[30]史金艳，杨健亨，陈婷婷，等.客户集中度影响现金股利的机制——信号传递、代理冲突还是融资约束?[J].投资研究，2018(10):74-89.
[31]王晓燕，史秀敏，师亚楠.供应商集中度与缓解中小企业融资约束——基于债务融资的中介效应检验[J].金融与经济，2020(12):78-85.
[32]朱姗姗.供应链集中度、市场地位与企业创新[D].苏州：苏州大学东吴商学院，2018.
[33]唐清泉，巫岑.银行业结构与企业创新活动的融资约束[J].金融研究，2015(7):116-134.
[34]余明桂，钟慧洁，范蕊.民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J].金融研究，2019(4):75-90.
[35]温忠麟，张雷，侯杰泰，等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报，2004(5):614-620.
(1)技术密集型行业包括:C27医药制造业,C34通用设备制造业,C35专用设备制造业,C36汽车制造业,C37船舶、航空航天和其他运输设备,C38电气机械及器材制造业,C39计算机,通信和其他电子设备制造业,C40仪器仪表制造业。其他制造类子行业归类为非技术密集型行业。
(2)配对结果限于篇幅留存备索。
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2022.04.001
中图分类号:F425;F274;F273.1;F832.51
引用信息:
[1]徐星美,权小锋,朱姗姗.供应链集中度与企业创新——基于中国制造业上市公司的实证研究[J].商业经济与管理,2022,No.366(04):5-16.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2022.04.001.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“国有企业监督制度改革与创新研究”(17ZDA087);国家社会科学基金一般项目“供应链关系对股票崩盘风险的影响机理与经济后果研究”(18BGL065); 国家自然科学基金面上项目“高管从军经历、管理风格与企业创新”(71772131); 教育部人文社会科学基金一般项目“机构投资者调研与盈余管理：理论机理与实证研究”(18JYC630215)
2022-04-15
2022-04-15