| 2,839 | 4 | 249 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
多元雇佣触发的员工内部关系矛盾问题日趋复杂，如何促进多元雇佣聚力发展，已成为零工经济情境下理论和实践领域着力探讨的核心议题。文章基于社会交换理论，引入关系认同和感知义务作为中介变量，将任务相依性作为边界条件，构建临时员工助人行为对正式员工隐性知识分享的双路径机理模型，旨在分析临时员工助人行为对正式员工隐性知识分享的作用效果及潜在机制。通过对三阶段收集的237份纵向数据分析表明：关系认同和感知义务在临时员工助人行为与正式员工隐性知识分享之间起中介作用；任务相依性会强化临时员工助人行为对关系认同和感知义务的影响效应，并且任务相依性能够调节关系认同和感知义务的中介路径，即任务相依性程度越强，临时员工通过关系认同和感知义务对正式员工隐性知识分享的正向影响越强。
Abstract：The employee relationship caused by diverse employment is a complicated problem.The promotion of diverse employment has become the core issue in practice and academia.Based on the social exchange theory,using relational identification and perception obligation as a mediation variable and task interdependence as boundary conditions,this paper builds a dual-path influence mechanism model of temporary employees’helping behaviors on permanent employees,aiming to explore whether temporary employees’helping behaviors can have an ice-breaking effect on employee relations and break the invisible barrier between temporary employees and permanent employees in the organization.A total of 237 data samples were collected in three stages.The results show that the temporary employees’helping behaviors have a significant positive predictive effect on the permanent employees tacit knowledge sharing,and the relationship identification and perception obligation of permanent employees play a mediating role in the relationship between them.Task interdependence plays a moderating role in the mediating path between temporary employees helping behavior and permanent employees tacit knowledge sharing,that is,the stronger the degree of task interdependence,the stronger the positive influence of temporary employees’helping behaviors on permanent employees tacit knowledge sharing through relationship identification and perception obligation.
[1]WILKIN C L. I can’t get no job satisfaction︰meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(1):47-64.
[2]CAPPELLI P, KELLER J R. Classifying work in the new economy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013, 38(4):575-596.
[3]KUHN K N. The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2016, 9(1):157-162.
[4]KALLEBERG A L, VALLAS S P. Probing precarious work︰theory, research, and politics[J]. Research in the Sociology of Work, 2018, 31(1):1-30.
[5]ELDOR L, CAPPELLI P. The use of agency workers hurts business performance︰an integrated indirect model[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2021, 64(3):824-850.
[6]OECD. Temporary employment[EB/OL].(2020-11-23)[2021-8-28]. https://data. oecd. org/emp/temporary-employment.htm.
[7]BROTEN N, DWORSKY M, POWELL D, et al. Do temporary workers experience additional employment and earnings risk after workplace injuries?[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2022, 209:104628.
[8]GREEN A, LIVANOS I. Involuntary non-standard employment in europe[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2017,24(2):175-192.
[9]CLINTON M E, PRATISTA N, STURGES J. Do temporary workers always lower work group effectiveness? The moderating effect of job similarity in blended work groups[J]. Applied Psychology, 2021, 70(4):1810-1840.
[10]BANERJEE M, TOLBERT P S, DICICCIO T. Friend or foe? The effects of contingent employees on standard employees’ work attitudes[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23(11):2180-2204.
[11]BONET R, ELVIRA M, VISINTIN S. Hiring temps but losing perms? Temporary worker inflows and voluntary turnover of permanent employees[J]. Work Employment and Society, 2022, 38(1):83-102.
[12]STEA D, PEDERSEN T, FOSS N J. The relational antecedents of interpersonal helping︰quantity, quality or both?[J].British Journal of Management, 2017, 28(2):197-212.
[13]HAN M, SUN Z, LI L. Helping behavior and employee creativity︰the combined roles of mastery and performance motivation climates[J]. Social Behavior and Personality︰An International Journal, 2020, 12(48):102-119.
[14]WIENGARTEN F, ONOFREI G, FYNES B, et al. Exploring the quality performance implications of temporary workers︰the importance of process capabilities[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2022, 60(18):5539-5552.
[15]YUE Y, WANG K L, GROTH M. Feeling bad and doing good︰the effect of customer mistreatment on service employee’s daily display of helping behaviors[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2017, 70(4):769-808.
[16]NONAKA I. The knowledge-creating company[M]. Boston︰Harvard Business Press Books, 2008:121.
[17]GRANT R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2):109-122.
[18]BOCK G W, ZMUD R W, KIMY G, et al. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing︰examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(1):87-111.
[19]PU B, SANG W, YANG J, et al. The effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employees’ tacit knowledge sharing in start-ups︰a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2022, 15(8):137-149.
[20]LONG C F, ZHANG X H, TANG G W, et al. The impact of employees’ relationships on tacit knowledge sharing[J].Chinese Management Studies, 2015, 9(4):611-625.
[21]MALHOTRA N, ASHILL N, LAGES C R, et al. Understanding the role of frontline employee felt obligation in services[J].The Service Industries Journal, 2021, 42(11/12):843-871.
[22] QU R, JANSSEN O, SHI K. Transformational leadership and follower creativity︰the mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2015, 26(2):286-299.
[23]HOMANS G C. Social behavior as exchange[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63(6):597-606.
[24]吴坤津，刘善仕，王红丽，等．“真有之情”与“应有之情”：内部人身份感知对员工创新行为的双重影响机制[J]．商业经济与管理，2016(7):64-72.
[25]KANG J H, MATUSIK J G, BARCLAY L A. Affective and normative motives to work overtime in asian organizations︰four cultural orientations from confucian ethics[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 140(1):115-130.
[26]ANAND S, VIDYARTHI P, ROLNICKI S. Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors︰contextual effects of leader power distance and group task interdependence[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2018, 29(4):489-500.
[27]CALMAR A S, MOYNIHAN D P. How diversity and task interdependence facilitates social categorization and problem solving[J]. Academy of Management, 2015(1):12291.
[28] D’OLIVEIRA T C, PERSICO L. Workplace isolation, loneliness and well being at work︰the mediating role of task interdependence and supportive behaviours[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2023, 106:103894.
[29]ROSEN M A, DIAZGRANADOS D, DIETZ A S, et al. Teamwork in healthcare︰key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care[J]. American Psychologist, 2018, 73(4):433-450.
[30] SLUSS D M, ASHFORTH B E. Relational identity and identification︰defining ourselves through work relationships[J].Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1):9-32.
[31]BANAJI M R, PRENTICE D A. The self in social contexts[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1994, 45(1):297-332.
[32]ZHANG S, CHEN G, CHEN X P, et al. Relational versus collective identification within work groups︰conceptualization measurement development and nomological network building[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(6):1700-1731.
[33]ZHENG G, ZHOU Y, SONG L J. Linking leader humility with follower performance︰a perspective of multi-foci relational identification[J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42(21):18080-18098.
[34]EAGLY A H, CHAIKEN S. The psychology of attitudes[M]. New York︰Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1993:67-72.
[35]BELOGOLOVSKY E, BAMBERGER P, ALTERMAN V, et al. Looking for assistance in the dark︰pay secrecy, expertise perceptions, and efficacious help seeking among members of newly formed virtual work groups[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2016, 31(4):459-477.
[36] WANG P, WALUMBWA F O, WANG H, et al. Unraveling the relationship between family-supportive supervisor and employee performance[J]. Group&Organization Management, 2013, 38(2):258-287.
[37] CARMELI A, ATWATER L, LEVI A. How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing︰the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36(3):257-274.
[38]郭晟豪，萧鸣政．集体主义人力资源管理与员工积极、消极互惠：组织认同与关系认同的中介差异[J]．商业经济与管理，2016(12):28-36.
[39]ANAZA N A, RUTHERFORD B. How organizational and employee-customer identification, and customer orientation affect job engagement[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2012, 23(5):616-639.
[40] ZHANG S, CHEN G, CHEN X P, et al. Relational versus collective identification within workgroups︰conceptualization,measurement development, and nomological network building[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(6):1700-1731.
[41]瞿皎姣，曹霞，崔勋．基于资源保存理论的组织政治知觉对国有企业员工工作绩效的影响机理研究[J]．管理学报，2014(6):852-860
[42]STAMPER C L, MASTERSON S S. Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23(8):875-894.
[43]LIANG J, FARH C I C, FARH J L. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice︰a two-wave examination[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1):71-92.
[44]王红丽，吕迪伟．受控动机理论视角下的员工感知信任及其影响研究[J]．管理学报，2018(3):351-357,409.
[45]EISENBERGER R, ARMELI S, REXWINKEL B, et al. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1):42-51.
[46]ASPLUND K. When profession trumps potential︰the moderating role of professional identification in employees’ reactions to talent management[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2020, 31(4):539-561.
[47]ROCH S G, SHANNON C E, MARTIN J J, et al. Role of employee felt obligation and endorsement of the just world hypothesis︰a social exchange theory investigation in an organizational justice context[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2019,49(4):213-225.
[48]徐晓锋，车宏生，林绚晖，等．组织支持理论及其研究[J]．心理科学，2005(1):130-132.
[49]BLAU P M. Exchange and power in social life[M]. New York︰John Wiley, 1964:162-167.
[50]OZCELIK H, BARSADE S. No employee an island︰workplace loneliness and job performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(6):2343-2366.
[51]尹国锦．扬长能让员工更主动吗？[D]．重庆：西南政法大学商学院，2022.
[52]LIDEN R C, WAYNE S J, BRADWAY L K. Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance[J]. Human Relations, 1997, 50(2):169-181.
[53]BACHRACH D G, POWELL B C, COLLINS B J, et al. Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(6):1396-1405.
[54]LIDEN R C, ERDOGAN B, SPARROWE R T, et al. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence︰implications for individual and group performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(6):723-746.
[55]RAVEENDRAN M, SILVESTRI L, GULATI R. The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design︰task, goal, and knowledge interdependence[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(2):828-868.
[56] BERNTZEN M, WONG S I. Autonomous but interdependent︰the roles of initiated and received task interdependence in distributed team coordination[J]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2021, 25(1):7-28.
[57]刘军，章凯，仲理峰．工作团队差序氛围的形成与影响：基于追踪数据的实证分析[J]．管理世界，2009(8):92-101,188.
[58]MANZ C C, ANGLE H. Can group self-management mean a loss of personal control︰triangulating a paradox[J]. Group and Organizational Studies, 1986, 11(4):309-334.
[59]THOMAS J S, LOIGNON A C, WOEHR D J, et al. Dyadic viability in project teams︰the impact of liking, competence, and task interdependence[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2020, 35(5):573-591.
[60]ZHANG Y, LI T, YU X, et al. Task interdependence and moqi in virtual teams in China︰the mediating role of virtual collaboration and the moderating role of distributive justice climate[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2021, 16(1):1-25.
[61]NIELSEN T M, BACHRACH D G, SUNDSTROM E, et al. Utility of OCB︰organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(2):668-694.
[62]BRISLIN R W. The wording and translation of research instruments[M]. Beverly Hills, CA︰Sage, 1986:137-164.
[63]高天茹，贺爱忠．职场排斥对知识隐藏的影响机理研究：一个被调节的链式中介模型[J]．南开管理评论，2019(3):15-27.
[64]MCDONALD M L, KEEVES G D, WESTPHAL J D. One step forward, one step back︰white male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(2):405-439.
[65]肖金岑，刘雪梅，章璐璐，等．助人一定为乐吗？知识型员工帮助行为对工作场所偏离的影响机制研究[J]．研究与发展管理，2021(2):109-121.
[66] OTTO K, MAMATOGLU N. Why does justice promote organizational loyalty, job performance, and prevent mental impairment? The role of social support and social stressors[J]. Journal of Psychology, 2015, 149(2):193-218.
[67] JIA H, ZHONG R, XIE X. Helping others makes me fit better︰effects of helping behavior by newcomers and coworker-attributed motives on newcomers’ adjustment[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2021, 36(3):401-416.
[68] LIN W, KOOPMANN J, WANG M. How does workplace helping behavior step up or slack off?Integrating enrichment-based and depletion-based perspectives[J]. Journal of Management, 2020,46(3):385-413.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2024.06.004
中图分类号:C912.3;F272.92
引用信息:
[1]刘善仕,玉胜贤,刘嫦娥.投桃报李：临时员工助人行为对正式员工隐性知识分享的影响机制[J].商业经济与管理,2024,No.392(06):54-67.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2024.06.004.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目“共享理念下的多元雇佣：合作型人才管理理论构建与作用机理研究”(71832003); 教育部人文社会科学基金项目“智能制造对企业员工影响的双刃剑效应及干预策略研究”(22YJA630049); 湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2022JJ30208); 湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(21A0375); 长沙市自然科学基金重点项目(kq2202302)
2024-07-13
2024
2024-07-13
2024
1
2024-06-15
2024-06-15