| 895 | 24 | 45 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
制度起源的效率论,由于自身的功利主义色彩,已无力解释新的组织现象。制度得以形成并维持,越来越需要得到社会的认可、接受和信任。当学者们质疑传统的效益观,重新思考组织制度的起源时,合法性概念成为研究的焦点。文章围绕组织制度是经合法建构的思想,首先回顾了合法性概念的演变,从中描述了合法性对组织制度的基础性作用,探讨了合法性的来源,接着对组织制度的理性进行分析,认为理性也是由社会建构合法存在的,最后对合法性研究进行了简要展望。
Abstract：The Efficiency View on origins of organizational institution has become less convincing for explaining new organization phenomena owing to its utilitarian characteristics.Social recognition,acceptance and trust are increasingly needed to shape and maintain the institution.When the scholars doubt about the traditional benefit's theory and reconsider the origin of organizational institution,they focus their attention on the concept of legitimacy.This study focuses on the views that organizational institution is formed through legal construction.In the review on the evolution of the concept of legitimacy,it describes the fundamental role and origins of legitimacy at first.Following that,we analyze institutional rationality and suggest that this rationality is also formed through the social legitimacy construction.At the end of this paper,we demonstrate an overlook for the future research of legitimacy.
[1]MEYER J W,ROWAN B.Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J].American Journal ofSociology,1977,83(2):340-363.
[2]KURAN T.The Tenacious Past:Theories of Personal and Collective Conservatism[J].Journal of Economic Behavior andOrganization,1988,10(1):143-171.
[3]SCOTT W R.Organizations:Rational,Natural,and Open Systems[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-hall,1987:77-79.
[4]POWELL W W.Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis[M]//POWELL W W,DIMAGGIO P J.The New Institutionalismin Organizational Analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991:183-203.
[5]TOST L P.An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments[J].Academy of Management Review,2011,38(4):686-710.
[6]COLYVASJ A,POWELL W W.Roads to Institutionalization:The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science[M]//STAW B.Research in Organizational Behavior:An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews.Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,2006:305-353.
[7]WRIGHT E O.Practical Strategies for Transforming Concepts[M]//WRIGHT E O.Classes.London,UK:Verso,1985:292-302.
[8]PARSONS T.The Structure of Social Action[M].New York:McGraw-hill,1937:659-673.
[9]DAHRENDORF R.Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society[M].Stanford,California:Stanford University Press,1959:81-87.
[10]SUCHMAN M C.Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):571-610.
[11]TERREBERRY S.The Evolution of Organizational Environments[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1968,12(4):590-613.
[12]MAURER J G.Readings in Organizational Theory:Open System Approaches[M].New York:Random House,1971:7-11.
[13]PFEFFER J.Management as Symbolic Action:The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms[M]//CUMMINGS LL,STAW B M.Research in Organizational Behavior.Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,1981:1-52.
[14]MEYER J W,SCOTT W R.Centralization and the Legitimacy Problems of Local Government[M]//MEYER J W,SCOTT WR.Organizational Environments:Ritual and Rationality.Beverly Hills,CA:Sage,1983:199-215.
[15]OLIVER C.Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J].Academy of Management Review,1991,16(1):145-179.
[16]程新生,李海萍,姚效丽.治理人与战略控制的适应性过程:一个研究框架[J].财经论丛,2010(2):97-102.
[17]徐虹,林钟高,王海生.内部控制战略导向:交易成本观抑或资源基础观[J].财经论丛,2010(2):68-74.
[18]PFEFFER J,SALANCIK G.The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].New York:Harper&Row,1978:71-76.
[19]ASHFORTH B E,GIBBS B W.The Double-edge of Organizational Legitimation[J].Organization Science,1990,1(2):177-194.
[20]VEBLEN T.The Theory of the Leisure Class[M].Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1973:239.
[21]ALEXANDER J C.Theoretical Logic in Sociology[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1983:131-134,259.
[22]ZUCKER L G.The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence[M]//POWELL W W,DIMAGGIO P J.The NewInstitutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991:83-107.
[23]韦伯.经济通史[M].姚曾廙,译.上海:上海三联出版社,2006:212-215.
[24]SCOTT W R,RUEF M,MENDEL P J,et al.Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations[M].Chicago:University ofChicago Press,2000:128.
[25]GREENWOOD R,SUDDABY R,HININGS C R.Theorizing Change:The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformationof Institutionalized Fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):58-80.
[26]DIMAGGIO P J,POWELL W W.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality inOrganizational Fields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[27]ARCHIBALD M E.Between Isomorphism and Market Partitioning:How Organizational Competencies and Resources FosterCultural and Sociopolitical Legitimacy,and Promote Organizational Survival[M]//JOHNSON C.Research in the Sociology ofOrganizations.Amsterdam:Elsevier JAI,2004:171-211.
[28]SCOTT W R.Institutions and Organizations[M].Thousands Oaks,CA:Sage,1995:51-61,184.
[29]MICHAEL L.The New Structuralism in Organizational Theory[J].Organization,2003,10(3):457-480.
[30]RUEF M,SCOTT W R.A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy:Hospital Survival in Changing InstitutionalEnvironments[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1998,43(4):877-904.
[31]DEEPHOUSE D L.Does Isomorphism Legitimate?[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(4):1024-1039.
[32]DEPHOUSE D L,SUCHMAN M.Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism[M]//GREENWOOD R.Handbook ofOrganizational Institutionalism.London:Sage,2008:49-78.
[33]ALDRICH H E,FIOL C M.Fools Rush in?The Institutional Context of Industry Creation[J].Academy of ManagementReview,1994,19(4):645-670.
[34]BANSAL P,CLELLAND I.Talking Trash:Legitimacy,Impression Management,and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of theNatural Environment[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(1):93-103.
[35]SEARLE J R.The Construction of Social Reality[M].New York:The Free Press,1995:137.
[36]PARSONS T.Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1956,1(1):63-85.
[37]HODGSON G M.Evolution and Institutions:On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics[M].Cheltenham:Edward Elgar,1999:2-9.
[38]SUDDABY R,GREENWOOD R.Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(1):35-67.
[39]JOHNSON C,DOWD T J,RIDGEWAY C L.Legitimacy as a Social Process[J].Annual Review of Sociology,2006,32(1):53-78.
[40]PIERSON P.Politics in Time:History,Institutions,and Social Analysis[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,2004:99-103.
[41]朱富强.“为己利他”行为机理对两类差序性行为的解释——一些来自行为实验的证据[J].浙江工商大学学报,2011(5):58-67.
[42]朱富强.质疑理性经济人的两个基本涵义:来自实验的证据[J].浙江工商大学学报,2012(5):28-36.
[43]潘奇.企业与利益相关者关系的重新定位——基于哈贝马斯对话伦理的研究[J].浙江工商大学学报,2013(4):57-63.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2013.10.005
中图分类号:F271
引用信息:
[1]李晋,宗文,吕鸿江.组织制度的合法性起源研究[J].商业经济与管理,2013,No.264(10):5-13.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2013.10.005.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目“商业模式设计对组织适应性的影响及权变作用机理研究”(71102031);; 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于CAS理论的组织复杂性管理权变模型研究”(10YJC630174);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“企业无边界化中团队协调与团队创造力关系研究”(12YJC630155)
2013-10-15
2013-10-15