| 328 | 2 | 199 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
战略研究的范式正经历一个研究逻辑起点的演变，即从“环境-行为-绩效”范式，向“资源-战略-绩效”和“认知-战略-绩效”的范式演变，主导逻辑研究因其属于以“认知”为逻辑起点的战略研究的范式，并受战略实践观的影响，而在30多年后再度被关注。后续研究认为，组织主导逻辑是指从低层次的个体主导逻辑中涌现出来的，是寻求适应的复杂组织的一种涌现结果，但是只是停留在一个理论假设的研究阶段。文章基于主导逻辑理论的涌现性理论假设，构建了高管个体主导逻辑对组织主导逻辑作用机制的涌现性机理模型，并且运用神经网络和遗传算法，以跨学科全新的研究方法研究“组织主导逻辑”形成机制及其涌现性，试图攻克主导逻辑理论研究的一个难点。
Abstract：The paradigm of strategy research is undergoing an evolution of the logical starting point of research, i. e., the evolution from the paradigm of “ environment-behavior-performance ” to the paradigm of “ resource-strategy-performance ” and“cognition-strategy-performance”, and the dominant logical research has been re-concerned after more than 30 years because it belongs to the paradigm of strategic research with “cognition” as the logical starting point and is influenced by the concept of strategy as practice. Follow-up research suggests that the organization-dominant logic refers to the emergence of low-level individual-dominated logic, which is an emergent result of complex organizations seeking adaptation, but it only stays in the research stage of a theoretical hypothesis. Based on the emergent theoretical assumption of the dominant logic theory, this paper constructs an emergent mechanism model of Neural Networks and the mechanism of the executive individual dominant logic on the organizational dominant logic, and uses the genetic algorithm theory to study the formation mechanism and emergence of the “organizational dominant logic”with a new interdisciplinary research method, in an attempt to overcome a difficult point in the research of the dominant logic theory.
[1]PRAHALAD C K,BETTIS R A.The Dominant Logic︰a new linkage between diversity and performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,1986,7(6):485-501.
[2]GOLSORKHI D,ROULEAU L,SEIDL D,et al.Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M].2nd ed.Cambridge︰Cambridge University Press,2015:1-30.
[3]BETTIS R A,PRAHALAD C K.The Dominant Logic︰retrospective and extension[J].Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(1):5-14.
[4]张璐,韩玉琪,严子淳,等.主导逻辑:内涵、研究议题及未来展望[J].科研管理,2022(4):165-176.
[5]ENGELMANN A,KUMP B,SCHWEIGER C.Clarifying the Dominant Logic construct by disentangling and reassembling its dimensions[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2020,22(4):323-355.
[6]盛昭瀚.管理:从系统性到复杂性[J].管理科学学报,2019(3):2-14.
[7]魏琼琼,罗公利.企业价值共创体系的价值创造能力涌现机理[J].科技管理研究,2019(13):131-140.
[8]FRANKE T,ZU KNYPHAUSEN-AUFSESS D.On Dominant Logic︰review and synthesis[J].Journal of Business Economics,2013,84(1):27-70.
[9]李兴旺,陶克涛,张敬伟,等.TMT主导逻辑从抽象概念到“管理工具”解构---一家企业竞争战略的案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2022(1):15-28.
[10]张璐,曲廷琛,张强,等.主导逻辑类型的形成及演化路径---基于蒙草生态的案例研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019(3):56-69.
[11]EGAVETTI G,LEVINTHAL D.Looking forward and looking backward︰cognitive and experiential search[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(1):113-137.
[12]张璐,闫红月,苏敬勤,等.从“锁定”到“进阶”:如何突破主导逻辑的路径依赖---基于战略认知视角的案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2021(1):86-96,117-118.
[13]GRANT R M.On“Dominant Logic”,relatedness and the link between diversity and performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(6):639-642.
[14]VON KROGH G,ERAT P,MACUS M.Exploring the link between dominant logic and company performance[J].Creativity and Innovation Management,2000,9(2):82-93.
[15]苏敬勤,单国栋.本土企业的主导逻辑初探:博弈式差异化---基于装备制造业的探索性案例研究[J].管理评论,2017(2):255-272.
[16]苗东升.从“微本体”看系统的生成与消亡[J].系统科学学报,2019(4):1-6,28.
[17]李全升,苏秦,高建民.在位企业数字服务化转型的动力机制---基于主导逻辑转换的纵向案例研究[J].经济管理,2024(10):86-105.
[18]BIRKINSHAW J,HAMEL G,MOL M J.Management innovation[J].Academy of Management Review,2008,33 (4):825-845.
[19]葛明磊,武亚军.产能过剩背景下国有企业战略变革过程中的主导逻辑研究---以山东青州中联“水泥+”一体化转型为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021(1):146-160.
[20]THIETART R A.Strategy dynamics︰agency,path dependency,and self-organized emergence[J].Strategic Management Journal,2016,37(4):774-792.
[21]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队研究:从资源整合到过程整合[J].商业经济与管理,2011(1):26-35.
[22]汪金爱,李丹蒙.高管团队动力研究述评---基于高阶梯队理论过程模型[J].外国经济与管理,2017(10):53-71.
[23]HAMBRICK D C,GELETKANYCZ M A,FREDRICKSON J W.Top executive commitment to the status quo︰some tests of its determinants[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(6):401-418.
[24]CARMELI A,SCHAUBROECK J,TISLER A.How CEO empowering leadership shapes Top Management Team processes︰implications for firm performance[J].Leadership Quarterly,2011,22(2):399-411.
[25]CSASZAR F A,OSTLER J.A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations[J].Organization Science,2020,31(5):1198-1219.
[26]COOKE N J,GORMAN J C,MYERS C W,et al.Interactive team cognition[J].Cognitive Science,2013,37(2):255-285.
[27]SNIHUR Y,ZOTT C.The genesis and metamorphosis of novelty imprints︰how business model innovation emerges in young ventures[J].Academy of Management Journal,2020,63(2):554-583.
[28]康丽群,刘汉民.复杂组织目标体系的构成与权重:理论分析和实证检验[J].商业经济与管理,2019(1):35-48.
[29]吕洁,张钢.团队认知的涌现:基于集体信息加工的视角[J].心理科学进展,2013(12):2214-2223.
[30]SILBERSTEIN M.Strong emergence no,contextual emergence yes[J].Philosophica,2017,91(1):145-192.
[31]魏浩,邓琳琳,袁然.高管团队海外经历与中国企业的进口行为[J].商业经济与管理,2024(3):59-73.
[32]可星,张琳玲,彭靖里.企业组织能力系统涌现性度量模型及实证研究[J].科研管理,2020(8):181-192.
[33]CHATTERJEE A,HAMBRICK D C.It's all about me︰narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(3):351-386.
[34]李兴旺,梅步俊,李炳杰.高管团队主导逻辑对企业动态能力形成的影响机制及其复杂性的涌现效应研究[J].经济与管理研究,2022(10):113-129.
[35]白云涛,郭菊娥,席酉民.高层管理团队风险偏好异质性对战略投资决策影响效应的实验研究[J].南开管理评论,2007(2):25-30,44.
[36]BORNAY-BARRACHINA M,HERRERO I.Team creative environment as a mediator between CWX and R&D team performance and moderating boundary conditions[J].Journal of Business and Psychology,2018,33(2):311-323.
[37]陈亮,段兴民.基于行为的组织中层管理者工作绩效评价结构研究[J].管理工程学报,2009(2):44-49.
[38]田立法,张光磊,席枫,等.团队冲突、冲突缓解、凝聚力与团队绩效:一个纵向研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018(14):113-121.
[39]刘喜怀.新常态下TMT外部团队过程对战略决策绩效的影响---团队自反的调节作用[J].系统工程,2017(1):38-45.
[40]BARRICK M R,BRADLEY A H,KRISTOF-BROWN A L,et al.The moderating role of Top Management Team interdependence︰implications for real teams and working groups[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):544-557.
[41]刘训峰,田焱,林向红,等.企业资源构建与战略变化速度关系的实证研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008(6):17-22.
[42]王贞洁,王京.宏观经济不确定性、战略变化幅度与投资行为[J].管理评论,2018(7):207-217.
[43]AGGARWAL C C.Neural Networks and Deep Learning[M].2nd ed.Cham︰Springer,2023:73-117.
[44]杨晓光,高自友,盛昭瀚,等.复杂系统管理是中国特色管理学体系的重要组成部分[J].管理世界,2022(10):1-24.
[45]TANG R,FONG S,DEB S,et al.Dynamic group optimisation algorithm for training feed-forward Neural Networks[J].Neurocomputing,2018,314:1-19.
[46]ELIZAR E,ZULKIFLEY M A,MUHARAR R,et al.A review on Multiscale-Deep-Learning applications[J].Sensors,2022,22(19):7384.
(1)组织主导逻辑是结果变量,并不是影响因素,在此处进行变量说明,后续验证其与涌现性总熵值的关系。
(2)由于遗传算法处理数据时四舍五入计算机制,出现R2大于1的情况,是算法正确计算的结果。
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2025.03.003
中图分类号:F272.9
引用信息:
[1]李兴旺,武志博,梅步俊.组织主导逻辑形成机制及其涌现效应研究——基于跨学科研究方法[J].商业经济与管理,2025,No.401(03):38-54.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2025.03.003.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目“高管警觉性触发、个体主导逻辑变革与组织主导逻辑演变机制及其涌现效应研究”(72262026); 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目“高管个体主导逻辑对组织主导逻辑形成的作用机制及其涌现效应研究”(2021MS07002); 2022年内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费项目-多学科交叉研究专项“‘组织主导逻辑’演变机制的涌现性及其变革路径研究”(BR22-15-04)
2025-01-13
2025
2025-05-14
2025
1
2025-03-15
2025-03-15