| 514 | 14 | 241 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
文章基于碳排放责任认定的"生产者责任"、"消费者责任"以及"共担责任"视角,运用产业内贸易理论,分别构建了开放经济下两个国家征收生产型碳税、消费型碳税和混合型碳税的博弈模型。并利用各模型的均衡解,从国家福利、碳排放量和企业利润等方面比较了这些征税方式的效果,分别得出了实现国家福利改善、碳减排和企业发展等目标的条件,并探讨了实现综合目标的可能性。结果表明:分别从实现国家福利改善目标和实现碳减排目标看,混合型碳税均优于生产型碳税;从实现企业发展目标看,生产型碳税优于混合型碳税;任何一种碳税征收方式无法同时实现所有目标,政府必须在三个目标之间有所取舍,在一定条件下消费型碳税或混合型碳税可同时实现福利改善和碳减排目标。
Abstract：Based on the carbon emission responsibilities of producer responsibility, consumer responsibility and shared responsibility,the intra-industry theory is adopted to respectively build game models of two countries levying single carbon tax on production-generated emission,consumption-generated emission or mixed carbon emission under the open economy. Based on the equilibrium solutions of different models,the effect of different tax types are compared in terms of national welfare,carbon emission and corporate profit and the conditions for such objectives as improving the national welfare,carbon emission reduction and development of enterprises etc. are concluded respectively; furthermore,the possibility of realizing the comprehensive objectives is discussed. The results reveal that about the objectives to improve the national welfare and realize the carbon emission reduction,the mixed carbon emission tax is better than the production-generated emission tax; in term of realizing the development objective,the production-generated tax is better than the mixed carbon emission tax; none of the three tax types can realize all the objectives alone and the government has to choose between the three objectives; under certain conditions,the consumer-generated carbon emission tax or the mixed carbon emission tax can simultaneously realize both the improvement of national welfare and the objective of carbon emission.
[1]BIN S,DOSLATABADI H.Consumer Lifestyle Approach to US Energy Use and the Related CO2Emissions[J].Energy Policy,2005,33(2):197-208.
[2]樊纲,苏铭,曹静.最终消费与碳减排责任的经济学分析[J].经济研究,2010(1):5-15.
[3]WISSEMA W,DELLINK R.AGE Analysis of the Impact of a Carbon Energy Tax on the Irish Economy[J].Ecological Economics,2007,61(4):671-683.
[4]LU C,TONG Q,LIU X.The Impacts of Carbon Tax and Complementary Policies on Chinese Economy[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(12):7278-7285.
[5]ALTON T,ARNDTB C,DAVIESA R,et al.Introducing Carbon Taxes in South Africa[J].Applied Energy,2014,116(1):344-354.
[6]WHALLEY J,WIGLE R.Results for the OECD Comparative Modelling Project from the Whalley-Wigle Model[R].OECD Economics Department Working Papers No.121,1992.
[7]LEE F,LIN J,LEWIS C.Analysis of the Impacts of Combining Carbon Taxation and Emission Trading on Different Industry Sectors[J].Energy Policy,2008,36(2):722-729.
[8]YUSUF A A,RESOSUDARMO B.On the Distributional Effect of Carbon Tax in Developing Countries:The Case of Indonesia[R].Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies(Wo PEDS),No.200705,2007.
[9]姚昕,刘希颖.基于增长视角的中国最优碳税研究[J].经济研究,2010(11):48-58.
[10]SHIRO T.The Double Dividend from Carbon Regulations in Japan[J].Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2007,21(3):336-364.
[11]张晓娣,刘学悦.征收碳税和发展可再生能源研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(3):18-30.
[12]娄峰.碳税征收对我国宏观经济及碳减排影响的模拟研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014(10):84-96.
[13]BATABYAL A A.Game Models of Environmental Policy in an Open Economy[J].The Annals of Regional Science,1996,30(2):185-200.
[14]BATABYAL A A.Games Governments Play:An Analysis of National Environmental Policy in an Open Economy[J].The Annals of Regional Science,1998,32(2):237-251.
[15]BARCENA-RUIZ J C.Environmental Taxes and First-Mover Advantages[J].Environmental&Resource Economics,2006,35(1):19-39.
[16]蔡宏波,石嘉骐,王伟尧,等.技术创新、最优碳税与国际减排合作[J].国际贸易问题,2013(2):81-91.
[17]KATSOULACOS Y,ULPH A,ULPH D.The Effects of Environmental Policy on the Performance of Environmental RJVs[R].NBER Working Paper No.7301,1999.
[18]CHIOU J R,HU J L.Environmental Research Joint Ventures under Emission Taxes[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2001,20(2):129-146.
[19]HATTORI K.Firm Incentives for Environmental R&D under Non-cooperative and Cooperative Policies[R].MPRA Papers No.24754,2010.
[20]孟卫军.溢出率、减排研发合作行为和最优补贴政策[J].科学学研究,2010,28(8):1160-1164.
[21]杨仕辉,魏守道.溢出率,低碳技术研发形式与碳税政策选择[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(6):62-71.
[22]SILVA E C D,CAPLAN A J.Transboundary Pollution Control in Federal Systems[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1997,34(2):173-186.
[23]李长胜,范英,朱磊.基于两阶段博弈模型的钢铁行业碳强度减排机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):93-101.
[24]于维生,张志远.中国碳税政策可行性与方式选择的博弈研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(6):8-15.
[25]王坤,赵道致.差异碳税下企业的最优生产和减排决策研究[J].软科学,2014,28(8):21-25.
[26]李岩岩,赵湘莲.我国开征碳税的税率问题研究[J].财经论丛,2011(1):41-47.
[27]王爱国,王一川.碳减排政策的国际比较及其对中国的启示[J].江西财经大学学报,2012(5):5-13.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2016.04.007
中图分类号:F812.42;X196
引用信息:
[1]魏守道,汪前元.基于碳排放责任视角的碳税征收方式选择[J].商业经济与管理,2016,No.294(04):69-78.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2016.04.007.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“环境倾销与环境管制的博弈分析、效应比较与策略选择”(71273114); 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“我国劳动收入占比变化的多维考量及其调整策略”(12YJA790130); 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目“供应链低碳技术研发策略研究:基于政府环境规制和消费者低碳偏好的分析与比较”(2015A030310199)
2016-04-15
2016-04-15