| 385 | 0 | 56 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在全球范围内，职务舞弊事件的普遍性和危害性造成巨大经济后果，如何从源头缓解舞弊行为的产生具有重要研究价值。细化拓展经典舞弊三角理论，从压力视角分析职务舞弊行为产生的原因，揭示经济压力对于职务舞弊行为影响的内在逻辑。实证结果表明：经济压力越大，行为人职务舞弊倾向越高；自我损耗在经济压力与职务舞弊行为的正向关系中发挥着中介效应；心理资本越强、社会支持程度越高，经济压力与职务舞弊行为倾向的正向关系会减弱，以缓解行为人的职务舞弊倾向。从调查方法角度克服了职务舞弊压力的识别和度量障碍，丰富了从心理学视角剖析舞弊决策的研究文献；从行为人压力管理的角度为职务舞弊行为的预防提供了新的思路，以弥补传统外部监管方式的治理盲点，完善现实情境下舞弊行为的治理策略。
Abstract：Globally, the universality and harmfulness of occupational fraud events cause great economic consequences. How to alleviate the occurrence of fraud from the source has important research value. This paper elaborates and expands the classic fraud triangle theory, analyzes the causes of occupational fraud from the perspective of pressure, and reveals the internal logic of the influence of economic pressure on occupational fraud. The empirical results show that: the higher the economic pressure, the higher the tendency to commit fraud; ego depletion plays a mediating effect in the positive relationship between economic pressure and occupational fraud; the stronger the psychological capital and the higher the degree of social support; the positive relationship between economic pressure and the tendency to commit fraud will be weakened to alleviate the tendency of occupational fraud. This study alleviates the obstacles to the identification and measurement of occupational fraud pressure from the perspective of survey methodology, and enriches the research literature that dissects fraudulent decision-making from a psychological perspective. This paper provides new ideas for the prevention of occupational fraud behavior from the perspective of actor pressure management, in order to make up for the governance blind spots of the traditional external regulatory approach, and to improve the governance strategy of fraud behavior in real scenarios.
[1]陈艳,孔晨,王璐.决策信息心理加工、认知偏差与国有企业CEO职务舞弊行为[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2):113-122,148.
[2]OLIVER C.Strategic responses to institutional processes[J].Academy of Management Review,1991,16(1):145-179.
[3]滕飞,辛宇,顾小龙.产品市场竞争与上市公司违规[J].会计研究,2016(9):32-40.
[4]陈艳利,袁美琪.绩效期望落差如何影响企业现金股利分配[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):87-99.
[5]贺小刚,邓浩,吴诗雨,等.赶超压力与公司的败德行为---来自中国上市公司的数据分析[J].管理世界,2015 (9):104-124.
[6]陈艳,陈邑早,于洪鉴.责任分散合理化、负性情绪与舞弊行为倾向[J].会计论坛,2017(2):42-65.
[7]淦未宇,徐细雄,林丁健.高管性别、权力结构与企业反伦理行为---基于上市公司违规操作PSM配对样本的实证检验[J].外国经济与管理,2015(10):18-31.
[8]王明虎,荣益辰.政治背景、廉政建设信号传递与在职消费[J].商业经济与管理,2018(5):87-97.
[9]朱朝晖,林雯,曾爱民.高管机会主义品行与公司信息披露决策[J].商业经济与管理,2021(8):40-54.
[10]李世辉,卿水娟,贺勇,等.审计收费、CEO风险偏好与企业违规[J].审计研究,2021(3):84-95.
[11]胡海峰,白宗航,王爱萍.管理层过度自信对公司违规行为的影响研究[J].经济经纬,2022(5):89-98.
[12]杜林致.金钱心理与不道德行为关系:以物质主义价值观为中介[J].兰州学刊,2018(12):169-178.
[13]MCKEE-RYAN F M,HARVEY J.“I have a job,but...”︰a review of underemployment[J].Journal of Management,2011,37(4):962-996.
[14]MILLS R J,GRASMICK H G,MORGAN C S,et al.The effects of gender,family satisfaction,and economic strain on psychological well-being[J].Family Relations,1992,41(4):440-445.
[15]SHLEIFER A.Does competition destroy ethical behavior?[J].American Economic Review,2004,94(2):414-418.
[16]梁凤华,段锦云.饥无食寒无衣则乱无治:社会保障感受与不道德行为的关系[J].心理学探新,2022(6):529-535.
[17]WADSWORTH M E,COMPAS B E.Coping with family conflict and economic strain︰the adolescent perspective[J].Journal of Research on Adolescence,2002,12(2):243-274.
[18]HOBFOLL S E.Conservation of resources︰a new attempt at conceptualizing stress[J].American Psychologist,1989,44(3):513-524.
[19]BAUMEISTER R F,VOHS K D.Self-Regulation,ego depletion,and motivation[J].Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2007,1(1):115-128.
[20]李锡元,王伟叶.绩效压力对职场欺骗行为的影响机制研究[J].商业经济与管理,2020(10):39-51.
[21]MCLOYD V C,WILSON L.Telling them like it is︰the role of economic and environmental factors in single mothers'discussions with their children[J].American Journal of Community Psychology,1992,20(4):419-444.
[22]ENNIS N E,HOBFOLL S E,SCHR?DER K E E.Money doesn't talk,it swears︰how economic stress and resistance resources impact inner-city women's depressive mood[J].American Journal of Community Psychology,2000,28(2):149-173.
[23]BAUMEISTER R F.Ego depletion and self-regulation failure︰a resource model of self-control[J].Alcoholism︰Clinical and Experimental Research,2003,27(2):281-284.
[24]ACHTZIGER A,ALóS-FERRER C,WAGNER A K.Money,depletion,and prosociality in the dictator game[J].Journal of Neuroscience,Psychology,and Economics,2015,8(1):1-14.
[25]范伟,钟毅平,李慧云,等.欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响[J].心理学报,2016(7):845-856.
[26]LUTHANS F,YOUSSEF C M.Human,social,and now positive psychological capital management︰investing in people for competitive advantage[J].Organizational Dynamics,2004,33(2):143-160.
[27]陈慧,刘洁,王小华.后疫情时代的员工情绪耗竭与主观幸福感---基于原生家庭视角[J].商业经济与管理,2024(4):45-57.
[28]孙仕秀,关影红,覃滟云,等.青少年社会支持与情绪行为问题的关系:心理弹性的中介与调节作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013(1):114-118.
[29]肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994(2):98-100.
[30]CHAY Y W.Social support,individual differences and well-being︰a study of small business entrepreneurs and employees[J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,1993,66(4):285-302.
[31]CAVANAGH G F,MOBERG D J,VELASQUEZ M.The ethics of organizational politics[J].Academy of Management Review,1981,6(3):363-374.
[32]AJZEN I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior&Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):179-211.
[33]NG J,WHITE G P,LEE A,et al.Design and validation of a novel new instrument for measuring the effect of moral intensity on accountants'propensity to manage earnings[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2009,84(3):367-387.
[34]VISEU J,LEAL R,DE JESUS S N,et al.Relationship between economic stress factors and stress,anxiety,and depression︰moderating role of social support[J].Psychiatry Research,2018,268(10):102-107.
[35]谭树华,郭永玉.大学生自我控制量表的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008(5):468-470.
[36]柯江林,孙健敏,李永瑞.心理资本:本土量表的开发及中西比较[J].心理学报,2009(9):875-888.
[37]陈邑早,陈艳,于洪鉴.会计舞弊行为决策中的合理化因素:分析与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2019(7):85-98.
[38]NUNNALLY J C.Psychometric theory︰25 years ago and now[J].Educational Researcher,1975,4(10):7-21.
[39]周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004(6):942-950.
[40]PODSAKOFF P M,ORGAN D W.Self-reports in organizational research︰problems and prospects[J].Journal of Management,1986,12(4):531-544.
[41]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745.
[42]苗灵童,赵凯莉,杨梦圆,等.亲子依恋与初中生人际宽恕的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J].心理发展与教育,2018(3):264-272.
(1)由于社会支持题项为单选题对应分数设置,并非量表题项,因此不需要进行信效度检验。
(2)计算公式为0.309×1.896/2.205=26.57%。
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2025.01.003
中图分类号:F272.92;F275
引用信息:
[1]陈艳,黄诗华,陈邑早.“难堪重负”会使人“铤而走险”吗?——基于经济压力与职务舞弊关系的检验[J].商业经济与管理,2025,No.399(01):36-50.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2025.01.003.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“认知偏差视角下的国有企业CEO职务舞弊行为研究”(15BGL055); 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“基于金融科技的风险识别与投资者关注研究”(23YJA630014); 山东省自然科学基金青年项目“市场监管政府机构整合、企业财务信息治理与资本市场响应”(ZR2023QG055)