| 459 | 16 | 69 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
企业网络成为当今企业的客观存在方式,随着环境的变迁,其面对的不确定性日益增加。鉴于管理熵是衡量企业网络不确定性的有效量度,以社会学和管理学的相关研究为基础,建立了企业网络管理熵评价指标体系,确定了管理熵中的相关变量。根据管理熵理论明确了企业网络管理熵的计算过程,在此基础上通过Brusselator模型转义进行企业网络耗散结构的评判,从而便于企业网络的优化。最后以某旅游企业为研究对象,通过问卷调查获取了相关初始数据,进行了企业网络管理熵的基于Brusselator模型的实证分析,证实了这一逻辑思路的可行性。
Abstract：Enterprise network has become the objective existence form of enterprise nowadays. With the changes in the environment the uncertainty enterprises face increase day by day. Management entropy is the effective measurement means of uncertainty in enterprise network. Based on the research in sociology and management,the evaluation system of management entropy was built,the related variables of network management entropy are identified,and the calculation process is carried out. Based on the above,the pass judgment of dissipative structure of enterprise network be conducted with the Brusselator Model,which benefits the optimization of enterprise network. Finally,some tourism enterprise is taken as the research object,the initial data is obtained through questionnaires,the empirical analysis of enterprise network management entropy is done based on the Brusselator Model. The case study has confirmed the feasibility of the logic ideas.
[1]FRIEDRICH W,MISHAEL M,SIMONE A.Firm Profitability and the Network of Organizational Capabilities[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,2010,389(6):4769-4775.
[2]UWE C,KRISTIN J.Network Position,Absorptive Capacity and Firm Success[J].The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management,2011,9(1):57-83.
[3]CHYAN Y,HSIAN M L.Boosting Firm Performance via Enterprise Agility and Network Structure[J].Management Decision,2012,50(6):1022-1044.
[4]彭伟,符正平,李铭.网络位置、知识获取与中小企业绩效关系研究[J].财经论丛,2012(2):98-103.
[5]蔡乌赶,周小亮.企业生态创新驱动、整合能力与绩效关系实证研究[J].财经论丛,2013(1):95-100.
[6]杨君茹,费明胜.企业文化维度构建及其对员工满意度影响的实证研究[J].财经论丛,2011(4):99-104.
[9]邱菀华.管理决策熵学及其应用[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2011:121-170.
[10]张继国,VIJAY P S.信息熵——理论与应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012:20.
[11]何天祥.企业管理结构复杂度评价的新方法——熵正交投影法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(4):115-119.
[12]钟昌宝,魏晓平,聂茂林,等.一种考虑风险的供应链利益两阶段分配法——正交投影熵值法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(2):68-74.
[13]YUAN L,KEVIN C.Measuring Agility of Networked Organizational Structures via Network Entropy and Mutual Information[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2010,216(10):2824-2836.
[14]张铁男,程宝元,张亚娟.基于耗散结构的企业管理熵Brusselator模型研究[J],管理工程学报,2010,24(3):103-108.
[15]任佩瑜,张莉,宋勇.基于复杂性科学的管理熵、管理耗散结构理论及其在企业组织与决策中的作用[J].管理世界,2001(6):142-147.
[16]PRIGOGINE I,ALLEN P M.The Challenge of Complexity:Self-organization and Dissipative Structures[C]//SCHIEVE W C,ALLEN P M.Complexity and Management.Austin:University of Texas Press,1982:125-167.
[17]GALASKIEWIEZ J,ZAHEER A.Networks of Competitive Advantage[C]//ANDREWS S,KNOKE D.Research in the Sociology of Organizations.Stamford,CT:JAI Press,237-261.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2014.01.003
中图分类号:F270.7;F224
引用信息:
[1]于永海,吕福新,唐春晖.基于Brusselator模型的企业网络管理熵研究[J].商业经济与管理,2014,No.267(01):34-41.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2014.01.003.
基金信息:
国家社科基金一般项目“全球生产网络中本土制造企业升级协同演化机制及战略研究”(12BGL006);; 教育部人文社科基金青年项目“基于网络的本土企业升级机制及管理策略研究”(11YJC630192)
2014-01-15
2014-01-15